



|
King of Craftsmen
The story is told that many years ago, the king summoned all
the guild masters to the palace so he could determine which one was the best of
them all. For only one could be called the King of Craftsmen.
First the king called the Goldsmith. “You are able to work fine jewelry, set
precious stones in my crown. You have
crafted excellent goblets and tableware for my guests. Surely you will be named the king of all
craftsmen. I just have one question,
where do you get the tools to do such fine work?”
The goldsmith, feeling a little deflated, admitted that the
blacksmith made his tools.
The king then called the Weaver. “Your tapestries, depicting the history of my
kingdom and extolling my majesty, with crimson and gold threads are gracing
every wall in the palace. Who makes your
tools?” The weaver also had to credit
the blacksmith.
Next the Stone Carver was asked about the tools used to
create such exquisite stone work that made up the palace. Again the blacksmith was named.
The king enquired of the Wood Carver who decorated his
throne, where do his tools come from. “The
blacksmith made all my tools,” was his answer.
The parade of craftsmen continued with the Potter, creating
all manner of bowls and vessels; the Joiner, crafting fine furniture; the
Tailor, making the king’s clothes; the Soldier, keeping the kingdom safe; the
Carpenter; the Wheelwright; even the Farmer and Cook were all asked the
selfsame question. “Who makes your
tools?”
The answer was exactly the same each time. “The Blacksmith.”
The king then summoned the Blacksmith to the hall. In came the man, covered in soot, the king’s
servants wiping the floor behind him. He
was ordered to tell the king where his tools come from. “Don’t be so foolish,” answered the Smith, “no
one can make tools for iron work but I.”
Luddism
A Luddite on a computer is not the oxymoron that it seems to be. We
true Luddites are not haters of anything new, but are opposed to
technologies and even practices that affect one’s lifestyle in ways
that can be construed as detrimental (as determined by me). And a look
at the Luddite’s history will bear me out.
Ned Ludd, a feeble-minded young man (you can see why I like this
movement), accidentally rendered a power loom inoperable in England in
the early Nineteenth Century. He became the nominative leader of up to
one thousand weavers after receiving a field commission to General
Ludd. Disguised, unemployed weavers would show up at the cloth
factories and destroy the machinery responsible for the loss of their
livelihood.
It was not the power looms that these men were against, nor the factory
owners. It was that their families for generations had been dependent
on weaving skills for their income. Then with the invention of
manufacturing mills those skills became useless. So, at this point,
these formerly constructive members of society were out of work.
Without marketable skills and no way to feed their families, and no
business to pass to the next generation, they became more depressed,
desperate and bitter against the perceived reason for their
despondency… MACHINES.
The hand-weavers of two centuries ago were probably well founded in
their ire and completely justified in their actions. But we are cut
from different cloth. Machinery is not inherently evil, nor are the
owners of the same. A skilled worker can use machines in the normal
production of his craft. A machine is a tool, designed to help one do
his work easier. Our tools in the modern world are not the same
(always) as the medieval craftman’s. Because of access to advanced
technology, we are able to complete our tasks without some of the
adverse effects that were enjoyed by our ancestors.
Throughout the centuries, work was done by hand to the detriment of a
person’s joints and spine. The ill effects of manual labor is easy to
see in the hands, wrists, elbows, feet, knees and the back. Using the
machines of this age prevent some of the “itises” (bursitis,
arthritis), so craftsmen choose to take advantage of them. The machines
help one to do his work rather than take work away from the workman.
So the modern craftsman is helped by machines, not supplanted by them.
The Luddite of old was not given any choice in his non-employment
because of people with more resources, and hence more choices ,i.e. the
power loom owners. The choices that one makes determines the ultimate
outcome, but we need a good dose of perspective to get a glimpse of
what the effect of our actions could be.
|